On 11.02.06 17:18:39, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:43:14PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 11.02.06 15:11:47, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I had no problems with my chip, so this seems to be specific to > ipw2100.
Might be, yes. > > Huh, oh. I just see that after establishing a connection withoug > > wpa_supplicant now I also get a connection with it. However removing the > > module and trying "fresh" shows that it again doesn't get an ip. > > Hmmm. intersting. Which kernel are you using? and which version of > ipw2100? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>uname -r 2.6.15-cherry Self built. ipw2100 is part of the kernel since 2.6.12 IIRC. And the -source-Package in unstable is the same version as the driver in the 2.6.15 kernel. > Is this applicable to both options -D wext and -D ipw, or 'just' > -D wext? -D ipw is even worse, it doesn't even associate with the AP. The problem with -D ipw is the same as in the original report. > I don't have an ipw wlan device here right now, I can try to catch my > girlfriends laptop with ipw2200 for some tests, though. IIRC ipw2200 is far better than ipw2100. I don't have one myself, but from what I heard on various lists it works better. Andreas -- Truth will out this morning. (Which may really mess things up.)
pgp3DtNHaL0Dz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
