Package: libenchant1c2a Version: 1.6.0-11+b1 Severity: normal Hi,
ATM, the libenchant1c2a package declares the following dependencies against spellchecker "backends": aspell-en | myspell-dictionary | aspell-dictionary | ispell-dictionary | hunspell-dictionary AFAIK, aspell is obsolete and hunspell should be prefered. Shouldn't it be a good idea to move hunspell as the 1st alternative? It seems that other distributions are prefering hunspell aswell, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ConsolidateSpellingLibs What do you think? Regards, Laurent Bigonville -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libenchant1c2a depends on: ii aspell-fr [aspell-dictionary] 0.50-3-8 ii hunspell-en-us [hunspell-dictionary] 20070829-7 ii hunspell-fr-classical [hunspell-dictionary] 1:5.7-1 ii ifrench-gut [ispell-dictionary] 1:1.0-32 ii libaspell15 0.60.7~20110707-3+b2 ii libc6 2.24-10 ii libgcc1 1:6.3.0-14 ii libglib2.0-0 2.50.3-2 ii libhunspell-1.4-0 1.4.1-2+b2 ii libstdc++6 6.3.0-14 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 Versions of packages libenchant1c2a recommends: ii enchant 1.6.0-11+b1 Versions of packages libenchant1c2a suggests: pn libenchant-voikko <none> -- no debconf information
