On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 11, Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why aren't you providing openbsd-inetd.service as the real file and > > inetd.service as a symlink ? > Because naming the init script "openbsd-inetd" was an historical > accident caused by problems when replacing the old netkit-inetd. > Since we had this in jessie and it did not cause noticeable problems > I would rather keep the names as they are.
This bug report is the proof of a real problem that I encountered. Consistency between package name and init script and service file has no reason to be classified as "historical accident", it seems to be nice bonus point to me... Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
