On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 13:21:18 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-04-10 12:09:39 [+0200], Tino Mettler wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > > > I already talked to upstream about this last year during the "OpenSSL > > 1.0 vs. 1.1 in Stretch" discussion. XCA makes use of many data that is > > not available in 1.1 anymore, making a migration non-trivial. > > please get upstream of xca to talk to openssl's upstream to make them > aware of the situation and hopefully openssl upstream will add them > accessors.
Hi, I didn't want to state that there are no successors in 1.1. It's just that the accessors work differently, and making XCA build with 1.0 and 1.1 results in a little #ifdef hell. Another annoyance was that the OpenSSL documentation was somewhat behind at least last year, and the web server was in some sort of reorganisation, resulting in a lot if 404 errors. I'll ask upstream about the current state. Regards, Tino
