On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:19:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Maybe you can interpret that as a commit to the Policy repository that > will be included in the next release, as opposed to an actual Policy > release?
Of course. The fact that it's in git means that the change has been approved by the policy group, that's the idea, and that's enough. I've already made the upload, but I still have a minor comment: We have symlinks like GPL -> GPL-3 for some licenses, but not for all of them. Because the MPL license itself does not seem to encourage the "or any later version" wording (as the GPL does), I decided that we can live without a symlink for the MPL. But if there is a good reason why we should have it, please let me know. Thanks.
