On Sunday, 05 February 2006 at 19:33, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Norbert Tretkowski [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 07:35:18 +0100]: > > > I tested this on three different machines (2x unstable, 1x sarge with > > > mutt backports). > > > > All against the same IMAP server? > > Yes, courier-imap from sarge. > > > Can you try against some other, or with maildirs in the local > > filesystem? > > I tried it with a local Maildir, it's fast. Seems to be a problem with > imap. > > > I've done tests with 4 Mutt binaries (1.5.11-5 and > > 1.5.11+cvs20060126-1, both with libdb and gdbm), and I see no > > important differences among them (no variation between versions; wrt > > database backend, same as always: gdbm a biiit slower when creating > > the db, a biiit faster when reading it). I've tried it with > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bincimap) with a folder of 1400 messages, and with a > > local maildir with 10200 messages. > > Hmm... imap or imaps?
Would you be willing to try imap as well as imaps? (blowing away the caches each time). It'd help narrow down the places I'd have to look.
