On 2017-02-26 01:03:23 [+0100], John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > But the question is whether SSL support is actually relevant in khtml at all.
If it is not exported or mixed with QT's SSL then it is not relevant. > As you can see from the list of reverse dependencies, there's actually not > much that is using khtml and the very few packages that use it are offline > only like SystemSettings or Kiten. So, I don't think any SSL code is actually > ever used. > > I mean, if you really insist to rebuild khtml with libssl1.0-dev, then please > just let's go ahead in order to get the number of RC bugs for Stretch down. I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not depend on libssl after building and that is why I took a look. Then I noticed it is QT based and loads symbols which don't exist. If none of that matters then simply close the bug and keep everything as-is. > Adrian Sebastian
