On Tue 2017-02-21 04:27:26 -0500, Frans Spiesschaert wrote: > Just to clarify a bit: I rely on > https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/nl to find out what > packages need some attention as far as it comes to translation of > debconf massages. > This page (and the equivalent pages for other languages) is generated by > collecting data from packages sources. As soon as in a packages source > tree an outdated debian/po/nl.po file is found, this is reflected on the > web page. The source scanning system can't figure out that for your > package the debian/po directory is obsolete while it is still there.
hm, this page looks like it was automatically generated. sounds like
the generation tool needs to know that the vestigial debian/ from the
upstream source isn't used when the package is format "3.0 (quilt)".
But i don't know how the page is being generated, so i don't know who to
report this bug to. do you?
> I don't know if it is possible to remove /debian/po from your sources.
> That would prevent the scanbot from misinterpreting the situation.
I'd rather ship the sources exactly how upstream ships them, if
possible. I'll nudge them again about dropping their vestigial debian/
directory, or at least trying to sync parts of it with what we're
shipping in debian, which would at least remove the po/ subdir.
Regards,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
