Hi all,

>>>> I've prepared some first code [1] and will be testing it today in a QEMU
>>>> VM with SSSE3 disabled. If that works I'll ping upstream, OK?
>>>
>>> Ok, the patch looks good. Ping me if you need additional testing.
>>
>> Yes, please! I would be grateful for another pair of eyes. So far I've
>> been able to confirm that the patched Suricata builds, starts up and
>> stays up correctly on systems with and without SSSE3, and also emitting
>> the appropriate debug messages. If you have got something more
>> functional on one of these systems, I would be happy to hear about how
>> it works for you.
[...]
> Anyway, it works here! I tested the patch in my basic environment,
> with/without SSSE3 support in the cpu.
> Suricata just works in both cases with my basic, default ruleset.

Great, nice to hear that.

> You could add:
> 
> Tested-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <[email protected]>

Done... and force-pushed the --amended commit to my branch.

I'll open a ticket in the Suricata Redmine then to check with upstream.
They'll be able to comment further, let's see what they say.

Cheers
Sascga

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to