[email protected]: > I am not expert on writing systemd units, and I am unable to play with > this soon. So it would be great if you could propose a patch :-)
Sure. I might do it once I start using paxrat on systems without live-config (but paxrat is less needed on those systems, so perhaps I'll go with one of the other options instead). > Maybe paxrat should also take this into account for systems relying on > sysvinit. Well, dropping support for sysvinit is generally no good (that's rightfully frowned upon at least for Jessie and Stretch), but it doesn't mean that we have to invest time into *adding new features* to sysvinit systems for Buster. sysvinit users can anyway contribute patches :) Also, in passing, the fact PaX is Linux-only removes one of the main motivations in favour of supporting sysvinit. Cheers!
