On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > Control: block -1 with 848932 > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:11:14AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > > > One "proper" way to do this would be to introduce a perl-openssl-abi-1.1 > > > virtual package that the others would depend on to make sure they are > > > compatible with each other. Not sure who should provide this; it could be > > > one of the existing binary packages (is there a "main" one?) or possibly > > > a new separate one (perl-openssl-defaults?) > > > I've pushed an initial implementation of this at > > > > ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-perl/packages/perl-openssl-defaults.git > > > > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/perl-openssl-defaults.git > > Uploaded to NEW, marking the ITP as blocking this bug.
Happily, perl-openssl-defaults made it into testing in time for stretch. I intend to convert the affected pkg-perl packages to use it and file bugs for the rest (if any) in the next few days. Once those are done, perl-openssl-defalts can Break all the earlier versions to make sure all the packages get upgraded together (although that's not strictly necessary for the jessie -> stretch upgrade as noted earlier on this bug.) -- Niko Tyni [email protected]
