wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes: > Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > >> Ferenc Wágner: >> >>> Thanks for re-closing this bug. Could you please help me understand why >>> xml-security-c 1.7.3-4 hasn't migrated to testing yet, even though >>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xml-security-c says it's "47 >>> days old (needed 10 days)" and "valid candidate"? Is this related to >>> the ssl1.0 transition? Do I have to do anything to move things forward? >> >> According to Britney, migrating xml-security-c would break >> "libsaml2-dev, libshibsp-dev, libxmltooling-dev" (at least on mipsel). >> >> The latter two looks like they will become ready to migrate later today, >> so it /might/ fix itself tonight. > > shibboleth-sp2 migrated successfully, but xml-security-c and xmltooling > is still stuck. Installing the mipsel dev packages in a porterbox > chroot is successful (I know this isn't a good test, but no idea how to > run a better one). Could you please help resolving this?
I don't know who or what fixed it, but xml-security-c and xmltooling finally migrated to testing. Thanks for the nice new year gift! -- Regards, Feri
