On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 at 18:26:24 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 10:49:11 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > I bumped to a snapshot release because several people asked me to do so. > > I was one of those. The changes in the snapshot are requiered for the > various translation tools, to convert from the legacy iptables to > nftables command-line syntax, or to be able to inject rules into > the nftables using iptables commands and syntax, otherwise the tools > do not see each others rulesets. I'm sorry this has caused grief for > Arturo and the Release Team. :(
At this point 4 out of 6 strong rdeps are using libxtables12 even without any binNMUs having taken place, so I think perhaps at this point we have stepped in so far that, should we wade no more, returning were as tedious as go o'er. (With apologies to Shakespeare.) I suspect doing the revert would end up as rather a mess, because of the past upload of a libxtables11 incorrectly containing libxtables.so.12, which required Breaks/Replaces to fix. > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:05:35 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Wait, *added* a few new symbols? > > It also changes the «struct xtables_match», which is passed and returned > as part of the public API. OK, then the new SONAME is indeed justified. On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 16:43:14 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > No idea how to express this in ben syntax, but Recommends need to be > looked at too. iproute2 has some modules depend on libxtables > (optional, and thus Recommends, not Depends). Please could someone from the release team set up a manual tracker that also looks at Recommends? Thanks, S