On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:57:06 -0800 Diane Trout <di...@ghic.org> wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > > Owner: Diane Trout <di...@ghic.org> > > > > > > * Package name : distributed > > > > I spent some time discussing this on #debian-python. > > What do you think of: > > Source package name: dask.distributed > Binary package name: python3-distributed > > Debian Python policy says the name after the - should be the import > name. But at least the python prefix provides a namespace. I think these names are fine: * They don't violate the Policy. * The binary package's name clearly refers to Python 3 and is "namespaced". Well, to be honest, I don't like the dot in the source package's name but I wholly admit this is absolutely an aesthetic thing :-) (Being a programmer, I have a certain set of skews related to dots in identifiers of various types of things.) TL;DR The names appear to be just fine.
