On 2006-01-28 Andreas Feldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: exim
> Version: 3.36-18
> Severity: important

> According to http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.00/doc/html/FAQ_0.html,
> /usr/sbin/exim should have the setuid bit set. This is not the case in
> the current distribution.
[...]
> Architecture: alpha
[...]

The alpha, mips, and mipsel packages seem to have been misbuilt:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ for i in 
/org/ftp.root/debian/pool/main/e/exim/exim_3.36-18_*
deb ; do basename $i ;  dpkg -c $i | grep -E '/usr/sbin/exim$' ; done
exim_3.36-18_alpha.deb
-rwxr-xr-x root/root    633496 2006-01-11 16:53:42 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_arm.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    483272 2006-01-11 16:12:53 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_hppa.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    518436 2006-01-11 23:07:47 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_hurd-i386.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    477900 2006-01-21 17:14:38 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_i386.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    482104 2006-01-11 14:36:28 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_ia64.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root   1087184 2006-01-11 16:22:24 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_m68k.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    441664 2006-01-12 03:18:28 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_mips.deb
-rwxr-xr-x root/root    683352 2006-01-11 17:56:17 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_mipsel.deb
-rwxr-xr-x root/root    683352 2006-01-11 17:48:03 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_powerpc.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    532452 2006-01-11 17:27:17 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_s390.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    511956 2006-01-11 17:24:34 ./usr/sbin/exim
exim_3.36-18_sparc.deb
-rwsr-xr-x root/root    505160 2006-01-11 18:53:53 ./usr/sbin/exim

No idea why.
            cu andreas
-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.                                (c) Jasper Ffforde


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to