On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>...
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>...
> > Worse, they break *differently* on whether…
> >
> > >Precisely to make the behavior consistent on all architectures, dpkg
> > >enables PIE (conditionally if no other flags marks it as to be
> > >disabled) on all architectures were gcc has not enabled this by
> > >default.
> >
> > … that. And that is just plain wrong. Either dpkg should inject
> > -specs= stuff on all architectures or on none. Differing like this
> > just invites hidden and hard to track down bugs.
>
> As long as gcc enables PIE on a subset, there will be need to inject
> some form of specs on either subset of those arches, either on
> hardening=+pie or on hardening=-pie, pick yout poison. :(
>...
Both gcc and dpkg playing with PIE just increased the number of bugs
without bringing any benefit.
I fixed many PIE related issues in packages when the gcc change was.
And now we got a new batch of FTBFS bugs for cases where the
dpkg specs change broke packages using "hardening=+all,-pie".
Please do the following:
1. discuss with porters whether PIE is working on their architecture
2. gcc and dpkg maintainers have to agree which package enables PIE
> Thanks,
> Guillem
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
