On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 07:59 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote: > On 11/21/2016 07:44 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > 1.1-4+deb8u1 was not a binNMU. > > Was it not? I'm sorry, I might be confused by the naming here.
You uploaded a source package to the security archive, which was then built. So, no, it's not a binary NMU. (If it were, there would have been no source upload and the binary packages would be +something+bX, not +deb8uX.) > I intended to express that it's just a rebuild against a newer libbotan. > No changes other than the additional entry in debian/changelog. Okay. Regards, Adam
