Hi Marc, On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 07:29:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hello Marc, > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:16:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + pending > > > > Hello Salvatore, > > > > Reopening a bug without any explanation is really not helping and > > respectful. > > > > It seems you rebuilt the package and found out it does not build well > > anymore, so why not provide the relevant part of the log and save use some > > time? > > > > Anyway, a new release has been done and is being packaged which should fix > > this for good. > > Apologies, thought this was clear from the context on the OpenSSL > transition. The reason why I did reopen the bug is, that bip FTBFS > when building with libssl-dev (OpenSSL 1.1). The issue was mitigated > by switching to building with libssl1.0-dev. > > Thus the reopening, *and* in particular the severity downgrade (since > not anymore RC) and the unblock on the transition bug. > > The issue can be seen as follows, switch the Build-Depends from > libssl1.0-dev back to libssl-dev. > > Hope this clarify, and apolgoies again the intention was not clear.
Just to clarify: the issue is not that it does not build with libssl1.0-dev, but that it does not build with libssl-dev. Thus the reopening since the bug is about src:bip (not) building with OpenSSL 1.1. Don't know if the new upstream release fixes this, but I assume Kurt and the OpenSSL team will be more than happy if this is the case and the Build-Depends can be switched back to libssl-dev in that course. Regards and thanks for your work on it, Salvatore
