On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Scott's latest patch needs a minor adjustment for recent suspend2
patches, which use /proc/suspend2 instead of /proc/software_suspend.
When was this change made to suspend2? The code might want to try using
/proc/software_suspend if /proc/suspend2 doesn't exist, in order to
support older versions of suspend2 (unless this change was ancient).
Also, if you've tested it, I'd appreciate if your patch would remove the
"# XXX: untested!" comment I had to write. ;-)
--scott
The diff is simply
--- 1000_resume.patch.orig 2006-01-24 09:23:05.000000000 +1300
+++ 1000_resume.patch 2006-01-24 09:23:17.000000000 +1300
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@
+ !then
+ ! # for suspend2
+ ! # XXX: untested!
-+ ! if [ -w /proc/software_suspend/do_resume ]; then
-+ ! echo > /proc/software_suspend/do_resume
++ ! if [ -w /proc/suspend2/do_resume ]; then
++ ! echo > /proc/suspend2/do_resume
NRA ODENVY SKILLET Diplomat non-violent protest Uzi SARANAC ZPSEMANTIC
Ortega KUSODA SEQUIN PANCHO RYBAT KUJUMP Delta Force JMWAVE plutonium
( http://cscott.net/ )
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
