On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:13:40 +0530 Sunil Mohan Adapa <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Perhaps plinth:plinth ? I see no reason to keep it as plinth:root.

Maybe the explicit version is better, but "plinth:" actually means
"plinth:plinth". From chown man page:

Group  is  unchanged  if  missing,  but changed  to  login  group if
implied by a ':' following a symbolic OWNER.

> The patch looks good to me. Please go ahead and commit it.

Done.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to