Package: gnupg Version: 2.1.15-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer,
I think it's actually an upstream bug since
‘d/patches/0020-gpg-print-fingerprint-regardless-of-keyid-format.patch’
seems to have been merged upstream, but in doubt I report this here.
~$ gpg --no-options --list-key 6294BE9B
pub rsa4096 2011-01-05 [SC]
DF9B9C49EAA9298432589D76DA87E80D6294BE9B
uid [ unknown] Debian CD signing key <debian...@lists.debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2011-01-05 [E]
~$ gpg --no-options --fingerprint --list-key 6294BE9B
pub rsa4096 2011-01-05 [SC]
uid [ unknown] Debian CD signing key <debian...@lists.debian.org>
sub rsa4096 2011-01-05 [E]
The key fingerprint is missing in the latter command output. I flag the
issue as important since there is no way to reliably identify a key from
a listing when ‘--fingerprint’ (or ‘--with-fingerprint’) is set.
Thanks for maintaining GnuPG in Debian!
--
Guilhem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii gnupg-agent 2.1.15-3
ii libassuan0 2.4.3-1
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-8
ii libc6 2.24-2
ii libgcrypt20 1.7.3-1
ii libgpg-error0 1.24-1
ii libksba8 1.3.5-2
ii libreadline6 6.3-8+b4
ii libsqlite3-0 3.14.2-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
Versions of packages gnupg recommends:
ii dirmngr 2.1.15-3
pn gnupg-l10n <none>
Versions of packages gnupg suggests:
pn parcimonie <none>
pn xloadimage <none>
-- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
