On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 03:49:15PM +0300, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: > On 09/13/2016 03:38 PM, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > > Hello Vassilis, > > > > please append such reports on the bugreport. Offline working people are > > unable to get such pastes. > > ok attached. I didn't know it is considered bad practice. I saw it somewhere > and looked cool.
All related information has to be gone into the bug reporting system. As systems like etherpad oder paste.foo are heavely relaying on a online service bug reports become useless if parts of the reports are not reachable. > > BTW: You also mixed up a different version than the thread subject is > > talking about ... it's importend to know which versions report are > > talking about. The compiler and some flags are different than in > > unstable. > > > > All bug reports are on debian unstable/experimental. There are 3 different > crashes and it wasn't feeling right to create 3 bug reports (I had already > created one) when there is this bug report about random crashes. A cursory > overview on this bug reveals many posted crashdumps. So I thought I could > add 3 more here. I tried to see if they are the same but that was a lot of > work actually since I am not familiar with thunderbird codebase. You need a widther look ;), the original starting report was about issues in stable-security. You talking about unstable/testing. This are since the GCC6 switch completely different worlds. So it's mostly impratical to try to compare booth releases. And we need a lot of time to jump between different bug report about propably the same issue and coordinate those with upstream reported bug reports. We may know a bit more about the codebase of Icedove/Thunderbird, but we are also fare away from a deep knowledge about to catch the segfaults. Regards Carsten
