> So what if I want two separate "devices" with two separate IP addresses? I > don't want all addresses on that bridge.
Sorry, I don't understand, what do you mean by separate? Typically if you are using a bridge it is because you want to link together several network segments on different cards so that all those segments are on the same level 2 network. What are you trying to do? How many cards do you have enslaved to the bridge? > There are a few options that I can see: > > - create two bridges and give each of them an IP, but not the device itself > - don't use bridges, and only use virtual interfaces: eth0:0, eth0:1. > > - or a mixture: eth0:0 == ip address, eth0:1 -> br1 == ip address. > > But that seems like the same thing to me. If you only have one network card I don't see why you should use a bridge at all, having two addresses on a network card either using card aliases (eth0:X) or several IPs on the same card using ip commands on a up statement is ok, but that doesn't have to do anything with bridges. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
