On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:01:11PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:42:14PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > control: forcemerge -1 830572 835200 > > Oops, I overlooked. Thanks > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:28:22AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Control: tags 835200 wishlist > > > > > > As for http://bugs.debian.org/835200 > > > > > > I wish debian/changelog to be updated with new upstream but not to > > > commit it to git repo. > > > > This makes a lot of sense but needs some tweaking to snapshot mode. See > > 830572 for details. If this doesn't fit what you expect please comment > > there. This is on the todo list but currently I'm lacking time. > > Yah, formatted debian/changelog file is already generated by uscan. > > All we need to do is to copy debian/changelog file from > <packagename>-<newversion>/ directory generated by uscan to the git repo > while on its master after doing everything as now. > > Hmmmm... how we get this <packagename>-<newversion>/ string ... > scripts/import_orig.py already have tarball name ... maybe hacking > around there should make this easy to get directory name just like > uscan.tarball I guess we need to add code to deb/uscan.py ... looks > like almost there :-)
The plan was to use gbp dch to generate the entry since we have this already and can tweak things as needed. You're basically already able to do that using the --postimport hook in gbp import-orig but we want it integrated properly without additional setup. Cheers, -- Guido
