On 11 August 2016 at 05:32, Bart Martens wrote: | noowner 833653 | retitle 833653 r-cran-gsl: suggested switch to different upstream | reassign 833653 r-cran-gsl | severity 833653 wishlist | stop | | | Hi Dirk, | | There is already a package named r-cran-gsl in Debian. | https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-cran-gsl.html | | So I'm reassigning your ITP to the existing package in Debian so the current | maintainer can consider a switch to your implementation.
Sorry, it it something else. I was wrong in my ITP title by not my package: Source: r-cran-rcppgsl [...] Package: r-cran-rcppgsl I packaged this upstream package (of mine): https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/RcppGSL/index.html It mostly offers GSL vector and matrix interfaces, not the whole of GSL or special functions. What you found, however, is that I _incorrectly_ labeled my ITP as r-cran-gsl which would be this package: https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/gsl/index.html This one offers special functions etc -- but they are not the same. Can you revert the four commands above? I may not be as handy with the bug tracker. "My" new package should then still come out of NEW. Makes sense? Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
