On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 12:06 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hm, the more i think about it, the more i like the idea of breaking > out > the sks-sysvinit package, actually. Well... them "problem" is that countless of packages could/would then splitup in systemd/sysvinit/<whatever the maintainer wants to support as well> packages... Not sure whether this is a good idea... and whether the improvement in keeping things "clean" justifies that.
Perhaps rather something that should be "decided" on a broader range for Debian. > it'd also likely fix this piuparts failure for sks itself at least: > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/sks_1.1.6-1.log > > 0m26.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: > /etc/rc1.d/ not owned > /etc/rc2.d/ not owned > /etc/rc3.d/ not owned > /etc/rc4.d/ not owned > /etc/rc5.d/ not owned > > 0m26.7s ERROR: FAIL: Installation and purging test. Kinda strange... here these packages are sysv-rc owned... if they're left over, than somewhere is a bug (dpkg-helper scripts? init-helper- scripts?) Cheers, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
