Joshua Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> So the part with the missing file is nearly clear - at least I cannot >> imagine how tetex could be responsible for it being deleted. But the >> segfault should be investigated; I'm unsure whether I just should >> reassign to perl - what do others think? > > This is really not an answer to that question, but perl-tk wasn't a > required dependency of tetex-doc in sid. I added it to the apt-get line > when I first got tetex-doc anyway - I figured I'd want it.
That's on purpose - the texdoctk script is in tetex-bin, and tetex-bin Recommends perl-tk. A dependency would be too strict, since many people will want to use tetex-bin without texdoctk. And similarly, many people install tetex-doc but never use texdoctk. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
