On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 03:46:18PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I'm well aware of the mapnik build failure with Boost 1.61 as I've been > following the transitions closely. > > Mapnik 3.0.12-rc1 has support for Boost 1.61 and is available in > experimental along with the rest of the Mapnik family which needed to be > rebuilt with Mapnik 3.0.12 (along with changes for the new Mapnik).
alright, thanks for the specification!
and sorry if I caused too much noise :)
> I'm going to wait at least a week before moving the packages from
> experimental to unstable. Hopefully Mapnik 3.0.12 final will be released
> by then, along with a new node-mapnik that officially support 3.0.12. I
> prefer to not have pre-releases in unstable.
this sounds like a good plan, a week (or even 2, considering how big is
this transition) is great.
> Ubuntu as usual has not
> bothered to coordinate with the maintainers in Debian, and has already
> synced the updated Mapnik packages from experimental, which I think is
> premature.
oh, well…
but anyway, ubuntu's developmenent releases are not widely used so I
wouldn't care too much if I were you.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
