On 2016-08-04 00:21:18 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The problem is that both 1.0.1s and 1.0.2g introduced those symbol > in a security update, and I didn't know what to do with it. > > For things in unstable that want to use the symbols, you really > want to have at least 1.0.2g. > > I still don't see a good solution for this, other than packages > that make use of those symbols to break on the 1.0.1 version.
I would align them for stable & backports and have them as-is in unstable. It should not clash because because we have a different so-name in stable vs unstable. > Kurt Sebastian
