Am 01.08.2016 um 23:40 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > So I think the kernel should enable SECCOMP.
I agree, unless SECCOMP on arm has some unwanted side-effects. Felipe, can you file a bug report against the linux package accordingly? > However, I think systemd should also simply (warn and) ignore seccomp > calls if seccomp is not available in the current kernel. I agree as well, Systemd should log an error and continue. We need to file a bug report upstream for that? Any takers? Assuming upstream actually decides to make SECCOMP (once enabled) a hard dependency, we need to find a different solution, like a check in the maintainer scripts. That said, we should first try to get that adressed upstream. Regards, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
