¡Hola Volker! El 2016-07-21 a las 11:03 +0200, Volker Groll escribió:
Holla Maximiliano,
Hm, not sure, but there is mentioned the crash occurs, when the birthday calendar is enabled, mine is disabled.It seems to me that the bug is the same as:https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358696
Well, it seems to be the same underlying issue.
Could you please provide additional information in the bug upstream? Currently it seems to require confirmation that this bug is only reproduceable in 32 bits systems.I have local address books and two on an owncloud server. Changing the owncloud resource to offline with akonadiconsole changes nothing (crash persists). I get also a crash from akonadiconsole when I try to switch to Browser tab.
Also, a full backtrace would be useful, for that you would need to install the kaddressbook-dbgsym package (and probably the dbg/dbgsym packages from a couple of kaddressbook dependencies) from the debug archive (that needs to be added in the sources.list as: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug unstable-debug main)Most threads are in g_mutex_unlock (), __kernel_vsyscall () Installing libglib2.0-0-dbg will give only 0xffffffff in output, so I purged this debug package again.
If possible please keep the full backtrace.
The output of the last thread is: Thread 1 (Thread 0xed0a6ac0 (LWP 5109)): [KCrash Handler]
Shouldn't there be information of 6 more frames?
#7 0xf4ff1cb6 in Akonadi::Tag::isValid (this=0xff8b137c) at /build/akonadi- uzW5jU/akonadi-16.04.3/src/core/tag.cpp:239 #8 0xf5097577 in Akonadi::TagModel::data (this=0x9b1c098, index=..., role=258) at /build/akonadi-uzW5jU/akonadi-16.04.3/src/core/models/ tagmodel.cpp:95
Looking at the code, my bet is that changing akonadi's src/core/models/tagmodel_p.cpp the function Tag TagModelPrivate::tagForIndex line 106: return children.at(index.row()); for: return children.value(index.row());would make the issue to go away (by creating a new instance whenever an invalid index is accessed), but the real issue is to be hitting this function with invalid index values (the previous fix only takes care of negative values, btw). That would need someone that actually understands the code.
Please, if possible, add the information to the upstream bug with the full backtrace. Happy hacking, -- "If you can't write it down in English, you can't code it." -- Peter Halpern Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
