On 2016-05-11 17:38, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> I am preparing a NMU to fix #823880.

Please don't, see my recent mail to #823880.

> Your patch looks good

Yes in general, but most changes are unacceptable within the context of
an NMU.

> and I can integrate it as well as a new python3-libsvm package.

Adding a new package as part of an NMU is definitely a no-no.

Regards,
Christian



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to