On 07.05.2016 10:03, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Le 05/05/2016 20:04, Matthias Klose a écrit :
Package: src:pocl
Version: 0.13-1
Found while looking at packaging 0.13 to be able to use llvm-3.8.
libpocl1 ships another library llvmopencl.so.5 in the package.
In 0.13, the llvmopencl soname is bumped to 7, which the libpocl
soname stays at 1. So you have to rename libpocl1 to e.g.
libpocl1-7 in any case, however why not packaging this library as
a separate binary?
llvmopencl.so.5 is a private library ship in $libdir/pocl/ and not
$libdir. Nothing but binaries from the pocl package itself must link
to it (and, if I recall correctly, only the libpocl library itself
link to it). So, I'm not convinced to the need of another library
Debian package.
Being in the same binary package ensure they upgrade at the same
time and avoid to have to ensure the same things with dependencies.
Upstream really managed them together and do not support using
different version. Supporting it in Debian can be done (with more
manpower) but I do not see any benefice.
Do not hesitate to present other arguments as, for now, I'm really
not convinced that "llvmopencl.so.5 should be packaged in it's own
binary package"
thanks for clarifying. However I also saw dropped symbols in the libpocl.so.1
library, so it looks like the library packages needs to be renamed for 0.13.
