Hi Tobias, Tobias Frost wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for yt (versioned as 3.2.1-2.1). The diff > is attached to this message.
Thanks, appreciated! A few comments though: > + * Remove B-D on libpng (Closes: #810209) The diff doesn't contain changes in debian/control. Looks like they were forgotten in the diff. And you don't want to remove a B-D on libpng but one on libpng-dev. I'd appreciate if you could be that precise in the changelog entry. > diff -Nru yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch > yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch > --- yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch 1970-01-01 > 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 > +++ yt-3.2.1/debian/patches/try-to-fix-ftbs.patch 2016-04-22 > 17:47:45.000000000 +0200 > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ > +Description: <short description, required> > + <long description that can span multiple lines, optional> > +Author: <name and email of author, optional> > +Origin: > https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/commits/069715baac70d5f0b186293b518eaf3802798370?at=yt > + > https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/commits/3f7547299119397d1e2e2baa1d42f809aef21e35 > +Bug: <URL to the upstream bug report if any, implies patch has been > forwarded, optional> > +Bug-<Vendor>: <URL to the vendor bug report if any, optional> > +Forwarded: <URL|no|not-needed, useless if you have a Bug field, optional> > +Applied-Upstream: <version|URL|commit, identifies patches merged upstream, > optional> > +Reviewed-by: <name and email of a reviewer, optional> > +Last-Update: <YYYY-MM-DD, last update of the meta-information, optional> Please either fill out this DEP3 template or remove it completely. But seeing a package uploaded with such completely useless dummy data gives a very bad after-taste. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
