On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 15:19 +0200, Denis Witt wrote: > Am 14.04.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > > Try running winbindd. This appears to be a known regression > > upstream, but running winbindd chooses a much more robust and well > > -used codepath. > > For the moment I downgraded to 3.6.6-6+deb7u7. I'll try winbindd but > I > remember some minor problems when I did last time, which was the > reason > for me not to use it. > > Anyway a security update should not break a previously running > system, > so a real fix would be much appreciated.
That is an understandable reaction. Sadly this will be the best option in the short term. You don't need to use nss_winbind or pam_winbind, just running the winbindd daemon allows Samba to follow the more efficient and well supported code path. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
