Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (28 Mar 2016 23:17:38 GMT) : > fwiw, i think this is worth doing for parcimonie, even if it doesn't > solve all the possible problems.
Thanks for your input, much appreciated! :)
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (28 Mar 2016 23:17:38 GMT) : > fwiw, i think this is worth doing for parcimonie, even if it doesn't > solve all the possible problems.
Thanks for your input, much appreciated! :)