On 2016-03-16 11:37:51, micah wrote:
>> Yes. In fact, I think it compromises the "encryption", "PFS" and
>> "deniability" aspects of the protocol, to be more specific.
>
> It doesn't cryptographically.
>
> You cannot take an OTR conversation that has been logged through an
> external means and prove cryptographically that this conversation
> actually happened.
I stand corrected on the "deniability" aspect, but the PFS and
encryption aspects still stand, and they are, in my opinion, critical.
A.
--
Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given
free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
- Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia
