Hi, On Sat Feb 20, 2016 at 13:25:33 +0000, Andy Simpkins wrote: > Dear Martin, > > You have marked the suggested move from format 1 to format 3 as "won't > fix",. > As part of the Cambridge BSP JMW has uploaded a fix for #799702, this > would not have arisen had ed been using format 3 packaging. > Is there a specific reason for not moving to format 3, or should we > apply this move as well?
is there a reason that does not allow to stay with package format version 1? i would like to stay with version 1 with this package? Beside that, all my packages are on low-NMU except ed. I would like to have seen that respected or at least a delay-3 upload. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[email protected]> Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
