Thanks to everyone for the explanation. I think I understand the situation now.
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 10:42 -0500, Mike Connor wrote: > The one point I'll clarify is that this isn't even something I'd call > an exception. We have always sought to permit and enable > modifications that do not negatively impact users (in terms of > security/privacy, user expectations of Firefox > stability/behaviour/compatibility, etc). Other distros have been > following this process for more than a decade, so it's definitely not > a special case for Debian. I'm thrilled that we're finally making > this step forward with Debian. If other distros have questions or > concerns, I'm happy to provide answers. Could the Mozilla employees in this thread please get the trademark policy updated so that what Debian and other distributions are doing is explicitly allowed by the policy? As it stands, theoretically "any modification to the Mozilla product" ... "will require our permission if you want to use the Mozilla Marks" and Linux distros are thus relying on Mozilla ignoring their lack of trademark license. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
