On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:51:09PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > 2) I removed versioned development packages in favour of unversioned > > ones. This should actually make *easier* backporting, as in all the > > past debian releases there is a package providing, e.g. libdcmtk-dev, > > even if at the time was different than the current one (now there is > > libdcmtk5, in jessie there is libdcmtk2). > > so not all (at least not the ancient squeeze and wheezy... we do still build > for wheezy)
umh, ok.
but libtiff-dev and libcharls-dev are both in wheezy ;)
Anyway, now you have a syncable package in Ubuntu (I already request a
sync to a MOTU friend of mine) and a buildable package that will migrate
to testing and as such will have chances to be in stretch.
Sorry if I accidentally caused more troubles for you (did not knowing
the full life and use cases of this package).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
