On 14164 March 1977, Marcin Kulisz wrote: >> * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) <deb...@kulisz.net>, 2015-12-22, 16:07: >> >* Package name : apt-transport-gs >> s/gs/gcs/ ? > Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't > really mind to change it to gcs. > I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to > emphasise
Which two-letter convention? apt-transport-https apt-transport-spacewalk apt-transport-s3 apt-transport-tor > that links later are starting with gs://<bucket name>, but if people think it > should be gcs instead I'll change it. Why are they gs: when its for gcs? -- bye, Joerg Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
