On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:38:30PM +0000, James Cowgill wrote: > Yes that's right, sorry I didn't explain that totally before. Port is > probably a better word in the case of this package. I can probably have > a go at doing it if you want.
That would, of course, be great! To avoid duplication of work, it'd probably be good to add a tracking ticket to https://github.com/mongrel2/mongrel2/issues. I know that upstream is aware that updating to mbedTLS 2.x needs some work. So it's possible that somebody already started working on it. Jan
