The patch has not been applied because it is not clear it is correct

There is a thread that starts at [1] and ended inconclusively at [2]

It's unfortunate that the number of people who understand power memory ordering
issues at the level required can probably be counted on one hand.  But I don't
think we should apply patches upstream feel don't address the issue

-i

[1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2014-January/005825.html
[2] 
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2014-February/005852.html

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags 728955 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Fernando Seiti Furusato has prepared an NMU for libatomic-ops
> (versioned as 7.4.2-1.2) and I've uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please
> feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
>  .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
>  : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer -  https://www.debian.org/
>  `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
>    `-   NP: Andrew Lloyd Webber & Tim Rice
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWaeF9XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
> ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREMUUxMzE2RTkzQTc2MEE4MTA0RDg1RkFC
> QjNBNjgwMTg2NDlBQTA2AAoJELs6aAGGSaoGWO0P/3y0daKtNH43R0nQDiPuWFfp
> 3dSFljsxqvD4sElq/OJJbDiS0rCiItOqug7BNllfjKrXvRo+n925sds37Bz2vow6
> ytkOh6bBQhLGA3zZhm4FvanaJEbpq93STxtyKWH28sA7hS74lIu4zy9Fil8BXXKh
> D3cDeJ4R4rpxVTpFi7+MOdApZNWz92LyACn7H4TgjWg9ECG0INqS/eTNV1jQkJYD
> AX5oK+Ny9N3Es0l4+rprqx1VUPr4T08ieC9D1j4QD6185NiQMH+xGv0QkbtnDnPO
> bNHkS5g2HeEh/ExQZNn2yMWqWOtHGbDPBlVpwEGjSUBP9ipXy/Gd2O4lg4S5wY46
> lj/gH6HfcBRQxlmeJ0a9/f57sJd3jIt3JDy5VbtjNU2t/OGsFMpUcnDThZzvFQ9q
> dYhEYekRcJ2vfFnYm5T68RvFZHUdkXujXaUQM47CjTji49Gi5AmAjCw6ZG65YSPj
> kMiYxxfbP8D0mGSqP5/Izyn33JwnJJ9S1OLrjfK2YnVZJnmjJTEZYAescHVPabZp
> PPfLnu1FWdjGxthZMwdRVWMX8gwqUH/TOnzCBYmcYobE3juuxiK6zg5NLz2MGVWv
> ixpgcW4e0gvODdgpjyuVIbbc+nuxQ/JUM2pJvV8NOJsuzLqG28VX1mVNth78ayPe
> kKz8Vt7biE/iGgXBuZlh
> =sBVD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to