"Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes: >> > Shouldn't there be a corresponding set of files appearing in the second >> > package? (in /Reporting/south_migrations) >> >> I don't know the answer to that question, my understanding of Django is >> rather limited (which is also why I didn't write the patch to do >> this). The "initial migration" file grows quite a bit, so it's entirely >> possible that it ends up containing the relevant parts of those, but >> this is only a theory. > > My understanding of Django is likely less than yours, it just seems odd > to have the patch create the new files and then for them not to be > shipped.
You were correct here, there was something missing from the patch. Even without the migrations in place an upgrade from the wheezy version did succeed when I tested it. Perhaps wheezy isn't old enough to need those. In any case I'll do a new upload to unstable with this fixed, I'll get back to you after that. -- Arto Jantunen
