Hi Jérémy, thanks for the patch. I think the general idea is ok, but see for comments below:
Am 10.10.2015 um 10:24 schrieb Jérémy Lal: > --- epiphany-3.18.0/debian/rules.old 2015-10-10 10:12:24.716438919 +0200 > +++ epiphany-3.18.0/debian/rules 2015-10-10 10:16:28.467707332 +0200 > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > && mv epiphany-browser.sh epiphany-browser > > binary-post-install/epiphany-browser-data:: > - sed -i s/@PACKAGEVERSION@/$(DEB_VERSION)/ debian/branding.conf.in > - sed -i s/@DISTROID@/`lsb_release -is`/ debian/branding.conf.in > - sed -i s/@DISTROVERSION@/`lsb_release -rs`/ debian/branding.conf.in \ > - && mv debian/branding.conf.in > debian/epiphany-browser-data/usr/share/epiphany-browser/branding.conf > + sed -e s/@PACKAGEVERSION@/$(DEB_VERSION)/ \ > + -e s/@DISTROID@/`lsb_release -is`/ \ > + -e s/@DISTROVERSION@/`lsb_release -rs`/ debian/branding.conf.in \ > + debian/branding.conf.in > > debian/epiphany-browser-data/usr/share/epiphany-browser/branding.conf Why is debian/branding.conf.in specified twice here? Won't this duplicate the entries? Did a test-build, and indeed the result looks like: $ cat debian/epiphany-browser-data/usr/share/epiphany-browser/branding.conf [User Agent] Vendor=Debian VendorSub=unstable VendorComment=3.18.0-2 [User Agent] Vendor=Debian VendorSub=unstable VendorComment=3.18.0-2 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
