OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#317610: Intention to NMU > Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:14:31 +0100 >> > I think that it would be more important to get out a working version >> > of AUCTeX >= 11.80 since that already includes preview-latex (upstream >> > version is at 11.82 at the moment). >> > >> > As it stands, this NMU is bound to be obsoleted by the next >> > AUCTeX release, which would be more important to focus on. >> >> This might be true, though it isn't reflected in the fime that has >> passed since this RC bug is opened... nor is it mentioned over >> there till now... So I propose to see this NMU as a temporary >> solution if that is OK with you? > > Debian AUCTeX maintainer is planning to upload next > release. I was waiting his work. So, I've not uploaded new > preview-latex revision. > > O.K. I'll upload next revision in a few days with your patches > to close RC bug, if he won't upload next release.
I presume that the next AUCTeX will have a "provides preview-latex" dependency or something like that (don't know the Debian package system). So it won't matter if there are newer preview-latex packages around. I also don't know whether Davide will model the new AUCTeX dependencies on existing preview-latex dependencies. Davide has a bit of a history of being overworked with regard to releasing AUCTeX: there were several other times where NMUs were looming. So as long as the responsibilities are distributed as they are, and if it is not too much work for you, it might still be worth updating preview-latex's dependencies as it is unclear when AUCTeX will actually get updated, and when this change will make it from unstable to other parties. After all, there is a number of Debian-derived distributions around. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
