[Re-adding the bug reference in Cc so the mail get archived in the BTS] Hi Sébastien!
On 2015-09-28 at 15:06 (CEST), Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Do you want me to apply this patch to 0.2.0 version? > > Well, it depends on whether the suitesparse transition starts before or > after you upload of the 0.3.0 version to unstable (and I don't have > entire control on the date of the suitesparse transition, since it > depends on the Release Team). > > So unless you are ready to upload the 0.3.0 as soon as the transition > starts (which should hopefully happen in a couple of weeks), it's > probably better to upload the fix to the 0.2.0 version (it should > compile against the version of suitesparse currently in unstable). Well, my intention is to upload GEGL and its reverse dependencies (with the help of GNOME guys) to unstable/sid within the end of the week. Gimp is building right now on buildd infrastructure to test all the architectures and GNOME-Photos is known to build fine against GEGL 0.3.0. So, I can assume I'm ready to upload this new version soon enough to avoid patching the old 0.2.0 release and keep working on the 0.3.0 for now. That said, I'll keep this bug report opened until 0.3.0 hits unstable/sid. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
