Control: tags 791323 + unreproducible
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:15:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the
> library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the
> library.
I suspect they are not API: they seem to be weak symbols for template
instantiations:
0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 GLIBCXX_3.4.21
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)
00000000000bf240 w DF .text 0000000000000138 Base
std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>,
std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >,
std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > >,
std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >
>::_M_get_insert_unique_pos(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
00000000000bf5e0 w DF .text 000000000000028a Base
std::map<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> >, int, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >,
std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >
>::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > const&)
00000000000bf1f0 w DF .text 0000000000000048 Base
std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>,
std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >,
std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > >,
std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >
>::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >*)
00000000000bf380 w DF .text 0000000000000254 Base
std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>,
std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >,
std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > >,
std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >
>::_M_get_insert_hint_unique_pos(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >,
std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >
const&)
Using "unreproducible" to mean "probably not a bug, but someone else
should have a look before this is closed". I hope that's OK.
S
