On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:10:16 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> against these packages.
There do not appear to be any rdeps:
smcv@coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n gpsim
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
gpsim | 0.27.0-6 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
gpsim-dev | 0.27.0-6 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar <georg...@debian.org>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
