Tags: pending
thankyou
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 02:18:22AM +0200, Francois Lafont wrote:
> The ps command doesn't sort correctly when I use the "etimes"
> specifier, but it works well with "etime" (without the "s" at
> the end). For instances, with "k -etimes" and "k +etimes", I
> have the same order:
I have in the upstream git aliased the etimes sort with etime
sort. As both columns are displaying the same thing in a different
format, it now sorts correctly.
$ ps/pscommand -o etimes,etime,pid k +etimes
ELAPSED ELAPSED PID
0 00:00 16895
110 01:50 16748
110 01:50 16749
1992 33:12 16258
3674 01:01:14 13425
3697 01:01:37 13336
3748 01:02:28 13231
3750 01:02:30 13216
606404 7-00:26:44 11882
2090807 24-04:46:47 26079
2090808 24-04:46:48 26071
2090809 24-04:46:49 26063
The relevant commit is at
https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/commit/313f9367397e2f1275186f5384371c9a5e24a8b0
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
